CA Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (D)Gives“Iran’s Desire For Peace” Credit For The Achievement Of Our Troops

Print the article

This entry was posted on 6/3/2008 12:02 PM and is filed under Democrat Extremism,Democrat Hatred of U.S. Troops,Media Bias,Political Correctness.

If you love America or care about the future security of your family or nation, and you haven’t seen the video of Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi’s 80-minute interview last Thursday, with reporters and members of the editorial board of the San Francisco Chronicle, you have to do so.

Since most people do not have time, or the patience, to sit through an 80-minute interview of Nancy Pelosi (unless you like watching grass grow), Media Research Center has gratefully edited out her statements made at the 62-minute mark of the interview when she credits the recent downturn in violence in Iraq—which actually indicates according to Al Qaeda’s own appraisal that they have lost in Iraq—to the efforts of Iran and their President "I’m mad and all in a wad" to negotiate peace there.  She

These people who are the leaders of the Despotcratic Party simply are children who are not serious about our security and cannot be trusted with control of the U.S. military—the greatest demonstration of our love not only for our own people, but for the people of the world because the arrival of our troops on any scene IS the arrival of freedom!  But the Democrats rather give credit for peace to Totalitarian terrorists than give credit to our troops who purchase freedom with their blood, sweat and tears.


To hear Nancy, the "Wicked Witch of the West’s, comments without having to hear the entire 80 minute interview, go to MRC’s humorous website, Newsbusters, click here. If you care about our troop, however, you may want to take a sedative first.

And you may want to contact CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, the NYT’s, LATimes, and Fox to find out why they have not been willing to play this clip. Why is Media Research Center (MRC.org and their Newsbusters site having to make it available. AMAZING!

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
    Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)
    Page: 1 of 1
    • 7/23/2008 7:38 PM Patrick Sovereign wrote:
      Just more evidence that the real threat is not the imaginary Islamofascist bogeyman discussed above but rather a very real one here at home:
      "For arguing with a TSA agent, Robin Kassner wound up being slammed to the floor. She's filed a lawsuit.

      "I kept begging them over and over again get off of me ... and they wouldn't stop," Kassner said.

      And it wasn't enough for another woman to show TSA agents nipple rings that set off a metal detector. The agents forced her to take them out.

      Mandi Hamlin said, "I had to get pliers and pull it apart."

      In Chicago, people like Robert Perry are subjected to exhaustive security checks. He was patted down, his wheel chair was examined and his hands were swabbed, all in public view in a see-through room at the security checkpoint. Perry, 71, is not alone

      "It's humiliation," Perry said.

      Perry was also taken to a see-through room by a TSA agent when his artificial knee set off the metal detector.

      "He yelled at me to get the belt off. 'I told you to get the belt off.' So I took the belt off. He ran his hands down over and pulled the pants down, they went down around my ankle," Perry said.

      At that point, Perry was standing in his underwear in public view. He asked to see a supervisor. That made things worse.

      "She was yelling 'I have power, I have power, I have power," Perry said. The power to stop him from flying to Florida with his wife that day to celebrate their 50th wedding anniversary.

      "It makes you feel like you have no rights," Perry said"

      Welcome to the new Amerika where the only rights you have are to treated like human garbage by Power Hungry Bureaucrats.

      In the interest of public safety of course....

      http://cbs2chicago.com/investigations/xrated.security.screenings.2.777423.html
      Reply to this
    • 1/10/2009 11:14 AM Jon wrote:
      But the Democrats rather give credit for peace to Totalitarian terrorists than give credit to our troops who purchase freedom with their blood, sweat and tears.
      Reply to this
      1. 1/27/2009 11:07 AM flipsidedon wrote:

        Urgent, you are exactly right.  This, sadly, should be expected because the leadership of the national Democrat party and of the "Moderate Republicans" are radical socialists who believe economic justice means equal distribution of wealth rather than a worker's rights to the benefits of his labors.  This is why the "liberals" so admire totalitarian Marxist dictatorships.  Those dictatorships have succeeded in applying the liberals' definition of economic justice.  And "if we would have economic justice, we should be willing to sacrifice our economic well-being and our culture's evil way of life and for all the refugees of the world who are poor only because of unfair economic systems such as ours", you see.

        However, as you know:

        A. because this socialist definition of economic justice goes against biological nature (including human nature),

        1-the only way to support it over time is first to become fascist (which means to silence all alternative views),

        2-thus, the will of the left (and "moderates" in Congress and the White House) to ignore the voices of the people who argue for reality (workers rights, i.e., "the early bird gets the worm").. 

        3-But to sustain the liberal anti-reality ideology is not possible without fascist and totalitarian control.  Thus the commitment to getting rid of talk radio shows and any other competiting  voices by the force of government, to removing guns from private citizens who might fight for their rights to the benefits of their labor, to removing the force of contracts, and to removing the prohibition against government seizing private property merely add to the wealth to be distributed to all by the government as it sees fit, to owning more and more of the land (44% of the land is already owned by the government), to controlling what private owners can and cannot do with the land, to controlling the kinds of vehicles we can buy and what we can do with them, to controlling the housing industry, the banking industry, the financial institutions, the medical industry, the weapons industry, education of our children, the educational establishment, ad infinitum.  (And just look at how well those particular industries are doing under their control.)

        4-And this leads to using the military to gain not just control, but totalitarian force so the people
        (a) will not resist either in word or action socialism's demand that they ignore the laws of nature, and
        (b) will work even though the benefits of their labor have been taken from them.  

        B. This inevitable sequence of steps that is necessary in order to support liberal ideology ("economic justice means equal distribution of wealth") is the reason that liberalism ALWAYS leads to totalitarianism. This is because socialism goes against nature (which always means that ultimately nature will raise up its head and smite you down), and, therefore if not stopped, always results in either/and:

        1-a people who try to dissassociate themselves from reality through inebriation or obsessions with cognitively anesthetizing entertainment,

        2-underground reality based markets,

        3-massive political resistance or revolution

        C. Either of (1) or (2) leads to ultimate economic collapse and/or anarchy, which in turn always will lead to consquest by an internal or external enemy or totalitarian dictatorship which will return order, but an order of their choosing rather than one based on the rights and will of the people.

        So, Where are we now as a nation?          We, led by the Democrat and country club Republican control of Congress for the past eight years--and the liberal control of Congress for all but twelve of the last 73 years--are at A.3. above, and are moving rapidly toward A-4.  We also are at B.1, and inevitably are going to see B.2, which has existed for a long time on a small hidden scale, mushroom soon into an undeniably potent counter economy.  And, of course as we clearly are seeing right now in our financial markets and hyper-inflationary bailouts/handouts, we are ever accelerating toward toward C being the only possible outcome. 

        Our only option then is B-3, or else this nation is destined to fail, taking with it not only our freedoms that it has secured for 222 years, but those of the other free nations that our nation has protected as well.  


        Reply to this
    • 7/11/2009 5:03 PM Messina wrote:
      Good morning! Thanks for the invitation so much. I will try to come back as soon as possible. .
      I am from Croatia and learning to speak English, give true I wrote the following sentence: "Situations like this must not humiliate you in front of others, so it is better to know the excessive sweating causes."

      Thanks . Messina.
      Reply to this
    • 11/6/2009 12:34 AM Internet Casino Bonus wrote:
      I think your designing work to this is really great .I really appreciate your work to this site.So thanks for it.I hope you can continue this type of hard work to this site in future also..Because this blog is really very informative and it helps me lot.
      Reply to this

    Page: 1 of 1
    Leave a comment

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.



      
    Copyright . http://FLIPSIDEBLOG.FLIPSIDESHOW.COM. All rights reserved.